Last week, with the Memorial Day holiday, was a slow week for wins in the federal circuits- there's only one short win.
Monday, of course, was a huge day for the government's ability to collect massive amounts of data about the citizenry. I mean, of course, the Supreme Court's opinion in Maryland v. King.
And, if you really are patient and eager for more of my take on the case, I was on Huffington Post TV talking about it (you can scroll past the technical issues, which, I swear, get resolved).
To the victory!
1. United States v. Joseph, Ninth Circuit: Appellant pled guilty to two counts of possession of contraband and one count of providing contraband to a fellow inmate in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1791. One of the possession counts and the providing contraband count arose out of a December 2010 incident, while the remaining count arose out of conduct in February 2011. The court imposed consecutive sentences for each count. Because the court plainly erred in interpreting § 1791(c) to require consecutive sentencing for controlled substances offenses that arose out of separate items of drugs, the court vacated appellant's sentence and remanded for resentencing.
About This BlogThe Federal Criminal Appeals Blog is published by The Kaiser Law Firm PLLC in Washington, DC. The Kaiser Law Firm represents people who have been charged with federal crimes, are under federal investigation, or have a federal criminal appeal.
If you'd like to speak with us, please call (202) 640-2850. Odds are we'd love to talk to you.